Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Thursday, March 07, 2013

Bowled Over!

As his last flick Did you hear about the Morgans, failed to impress the critics, Hugh Grant is regretting turning down the role of George VI in The King’s Speech. The British actor, who was recently in China, said he was smitten by the country and particularly the women there. He admitted falling in love four times within 24 hours of his stay! Well, Chinese women have every reason to be proud!


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Monday, November 26, 2012

US OFFICIAL LIST OF TERRORISTS: AND AN ANALYSIS OF WHY YOUR NAME COULD FEATURE THERE

January 20, 2009, Bush leaves the White House; but before that, he ‘updates’ the ‘official’ US terrorists list

The key points of the resolution, as stated in a policy paper of CATO Institute by James A. Dorn, states that if Unocal gets taken over, this “would result in the strategic assets of Unocal Corporation being preferentially allocated to China by the Chinese government.” That then “would weaken the ability of the US to influence the oil and gas supplies of the Nation through companies that must adhere to United States laws.” The CNOOC deal therefore threatens “to impair the national security,” and “the President should initiate immediately a thorough review of the proposed acquisition, merger, or takeover.” From Dubai Ports to Singapore’s Temasek, all investments by foreign countries have faced similar opposition in the US.

Clearly, when the US drains out oil from Iraq, then it’s not a problem the Pope should worry about, but if some other country goes in for a legal acquisition of a powerful US company, then Nostradamus inferences are redrawn to ensure that such moves are nipped even before the bud is born. If Iran is the latest to face the brunt of Mr.Bush’s rottweiler-like attitude – who wants the world to stop trading with Iran completely – what is not often told is the fact that there are several Israeli companies, like Medent [quoting Steve Rodan, Jerusalem Post Service] who do brisk business running up to hundreds of millions of dollars at the same time with Iran.

Bush might be leaving on January 20, 2009; but has ensured that NCTC stays in absolutely safe hands. The current NCTC Director, Michael E Leiter, is pretty well qualified. One hears that just a few handful of years back, Mr. ‘well qualified’ Leiter served as the Dy General Counsel and Assistant Director of the US President’s Commission on “US Intelligence Capabilities Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction!” Gotcha Elvis!!! Rock on!!!


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

WORKER SAFETY: COAL MINES

The shocking Chinese coal mines

China’s fatality rate per million tonnes of coal production was reported half a decade back to be 3,824. Compare this to the 0.1 figure in the US and even Australia, top coal manufacturers.

In 2006, Premier Wen Jiabao made commitments to improve the safety standards. Eventually, in the same year, he passed an order to close down any coal mine with an annual output of less than 90,000 tonnes. Shanxi’s coal mines still continue haphazardly. This year, the new Shanxi governor commissioned that by 2011, the number of coal mines will be reduced by 1500 (to 1000) and by 2015 to 800. The claim is that any shaft with an annual output of less than 300,000 tonnes will be closed and taken over by the government. Are the Chinese true to their word? Well, the coal dependent Shanxi’s economy shrank by 4.4% in the first half of the current year compared to the same period last year (and it is the only province in China to have experienced that). One hopes other provinces are next in line...



 

Thursday, October 25, 2012

SIXTEEN YEARS AFTER TAKING ‘THUMS UP’, THEY WANT INDIA

“According to the latest data compiled by A C Neilsen. Thums Up, an Indian brand that was sold to Coca-Cola (in 1993), retains the top slot of the most selling carbonated drink in India: AC Nilesen study, April, 2009.”

When they re-entered India in 1993, the challenges were very different. They had to build the market from scratch, which was dominated at that time by a number of local brands. Pepsi had entered somewhat earlier in 1989 and Lehar Pepsi had started making some waves. Coca Cola’s ingenuity at that time was to hit the home run in one go, when they acquired Parle’s brands, Thums Up, Gold Spot and Limca for $40 million. It is said that Coca Cola ultimately wanted to kill Thums Up but failed miserably. But strategically, Thums Up proved to be an excellent brand for them. It still remains the soft drink of choice in the Indian market. Besides, it also helped them launch a flank attack against Pepsi. “Thums Up was added to Coca-Cola portfolio in 1993. During this period, it moved towards a more individualistic masculine positioning in ‘I want my Thunder’. In 2002, Akshay Kumar was roped in as the brand ambassador and the brand continued to strengthen its position as a Male Iconic Brand through consistent positioning,” explains Kashmira Chadha, Director, Marketing, Coca-Cola India to B&E.

It has been a virtual duopoly in the Indian market, as both struggled to go one up on sponsorships, promotions, celebrity endorsements, distribution reach, product adaptations, et al. People would remember many instances – like the Nothing Official About It campaign by Pepsi (1996 Cricket World Cup), or more recently, Coca Cola sponsoring the Delhi Dare Devils and Kolkata Knight Riders teams, which got Pepsi in a tizzy (as team players Virender Sehwag & Ishant Sharma are Pepsi brand ambassadors). One of the interesting ploys on the product front was the Rs.5 Coca Cola bottle for rural areas. The strategy was clicking well, but Coca Cola ultimately withdrew it due to the hit it was taking on margins. But Coca Cola has turned corners after years of struggle (it is now profitable in India). The company recorded a growth of 29% in India for the quarter ended June 2009. Muhtar Kent, Chairman & CEO, Coca Cola, admits “Our investments in key growth markets contributed to the good performance in China, Mexico, India and Brazil (despite tough global economic conditions).


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Man proposes, God refuses...

Protectionist policies will save your companies, but only for so long as they don't beg for euthanasia!

The only 'right' turn in international trade today is, the 'American turn'; all others will fetch you a 'wrong-turn' ticket! Allow us to sound a tad out of proverbial tune here, but isn't that the truth? When the US government wanted the US economy to move from better to best, it allowed everything from offshoring to H1B visas, and God allowed it. Then, when it was time to save the world (and America of course), it is putting in place all sorts of protective policies, one of which was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on February 17, 2009, a massive $787 billion stimulus package; and God is allowing it! So how is this a vile definition of 'protectionism'? Section 1110 of the Act reads: “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this act may be used for a project... unless all of the iron and steel used in the project is produced in the United States”. Clearly, this "buy American" clause for worse, will firstly erode the competitive edge of the so-called American MNCs, and secondly, it will only encourage more such 'protectionist policies' from other nations in retaliation! There would be tall import trade barriers set by even emerging economies. Finally, lack of growth in local consumption, would force the US government to 'liberalise' its policies. But, the emerging economies would maintain the roadblocks; for isn't 'ego' a crucial 'international trade' trait?

Yes, our predictions sound far too pessimistic, but allow us to justify. The third largest economy in the world – China, has already taken the 'American turn'! And this seems justified, for why should China behave like a Third World nation and stand challenged by US hegemony? So there it is. On one hand, ensuring that an American MNC like Coca-Cola stands no chance in growing big on Chinese lands and on the other voicing out loud the purpose behind acquiring a First World MNC – Rio Tinto.
 

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Tuesday, October 09, 2012

The land of snakes, elephants and...growth

Ten reasons why India would grow almost as strongly as it has done in the past many years

Let’s demolish some myths and finally bury some shibboleths while talking about the Indian economy. And let’s do that with unadulterated facts; not prejudice and perceptions. The most pernicious one is the one related to that fancy term called ‘de-coupling’. Last fall, when the meltdown started in Wall Street, many in India insisted that we will not be affected because we are not really all that integrated with the global economy. And now, we have the same set of people saying that we are quite integrated after all; and we will feel the pain. That is utter nonsense as historical data bear out. Even during the old glory days of crony socialism, when the Indian economy was inward looking, global economic shocks always adversely affected India.

In 1967, when Europe and America were hit by a crisis of confidence, the Indian economy literally tanked. In 1973, after the oil shock roiled the global economy, GDP growth rate collapsed in India. In 1979, after the second oil shock, GDP growth rate collapsed all over again and India went to IMF for a bailout. When the global economy was entering a mini recession in 1990, the Indian economy again collapsed and the powers that be again went hat in hand to IMF. GDP growth rates in India tumbled yet again after the East Asian financial crisis of 1997. The ‘dot-com’ bust across the world in 2001 again led to growth rates crashing in India. So let’s stop fooling ourselves with this ‘de-coupling’ nonsense. The Indian economy will definitely be affected during the ongoing crisis. We can’t wish away bad news.

And yet, there are very strong reasons why the Indian economy will be the most successful one when it comes to riding out the current storm. And there is little doubt that it will be the first economy to emerge stronger with a more solid foundation of sustained growth. Surprised with such a statement when all you get is hysterically bad news from media vehicles? Don’t be. Here are the ‘fact’ based reasons why:

FDI: China habitually gets more than $150 billion in foreign direct investments every year. As a percentage of GDP, it hovers between 7% to 10%. In sharp contrast, Indian policy makers start whooping with joy when FDI crosses $20 billion. Not to mention that FDI has almost never exceeded even 0.5% of GDP. Now, we all know that foreign investments will dry up. But since most of India’s GDP growth has been driven by domestic investment, we will be the least adversely affected. Let’s say FDI inflow declines by a whopping 50% or about $10 billion. That works out to one-tenth of one percent of GDP. Do your own maths!

EXPORTS: There are horror stories floating around of how hundreds of thousands of jobs are being lost because exports are slowing down and declining. A recent government survey says that half a million jobs were lost in the last quarter of 2008 because of contracting exports. Half a million jobs gone is bad news indeed. But compare that with an admission by the Chinese government (A government that is loathe to admit anything!) that 20 million jobs were lost in the same period and you suddenly get a fresh perspective on where India stands compared to other nations. Also remember, exports from India still hover around 15% of GDP, one of the lowest figures among major economies in the world.

CONSUMPTION: The Indian economy resembles that of the United States in many unique ways. One of the most striking similarities is that related to consumption. Consumption accounts for just about 35% of GDP in China while it constitutes about 65% of GDP in India. One reason why GDP growth in China kept racing ahead of India was huge increase in investments year after year while consumption expenditure can really grow at more modest levels. When bad times come, consumption might stagnate in India while investment is bound to plunge in China. No wonder, the Indian GDP growth rate will moderate from about 9% to about 7% in 2008-09 while it is poised to crash from 13% to 6% in China. Slow and steady is often better!


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face


Monday, August 20, 2012

Why US sanctions are useless

With China around, US sanctions against Iran, N.Korea and Sudan are useless; US has to get China on its side to force a solution

There are some uncanny commonalities between Kim Jong-il, Ahmadinejad and Omar al- Bashir! All three heads of states have been in the international spotlight for the wrong reasons; and all three care two hoots about US sanctions because of their magnanimous trade associations with China, a country that deals with any country it wishes to, despite any sanctions against those countries. China is Sudan’s largest trading partner, Iran is the second largest supplier of oil to China, and China is N.Korea’s largest investor and trading partner. Unless US gets China on its side, none of these countries will care to sit down on the discussion desk.

In a secret visit to China in May 2010, Kim apparently came with a begging bowl for finance, food and fuel – and in return vowed to reignite dormant international nuclear disarmament talks, which were hosted by Beijing and shunned by Pyongyang for over a year. In February 2010, US and Canada achieved a valuable ceasefire between the Sudanese government and Darfur rebels. The bitter and bloody conflict, which claimed 3,00,000 lives and compelled 2.7 million people to become refugees in the last 7 years, has hopefully finally ended under US pressure and Chinese goading. If the US wants the slippery Omar al-Bashir – Sudanese President indicted by International Court of Justice for war crimes – to stick to his agreement, they have to use China to enforce the same. And if US wishes Iran too to start cooperating, China’s the answer.

Not that this absolves China of its past – China has regularly supplied arms to Bashir and to Iran; and has even played a major role in North Korea and Pakistan’s nuclear bomb development. But then, those horses have already bolted.


Saturday, July 28, 2012

Scrutiny-LATIN AMERICA: CHARISMATIC CONUNDRUM

Latin American states are led by Iconic Leaders who last The Short term, while North America is led by Democratically elected leaders through strong Institutional structures, which last the long term. Time enough for South American nations to gain from institutionalising Governance Structures than depend on individuals

But this has created problems for them too. Latin American states have always struggled to find their rightful successors. Thus, even though many assumed rightly that Raul Castro would be the successor to his elder brother in Cuba, there were ambiguities and speculations after Raul’s health problems in 2006.

The story is quite different in case of United States. While South America was led by popular leaders, North America was always led by leaders elected through the institution of democracy. Thus, US succeeded in establishing stronger institutions rather than just leaders. In US, leaders are held accountable unlike in Latin America, where leaders have emerged and stood above institutions. More importantly, when power is institutionalised rather than individualised, there is always a replacement/successor in place of the premier.

That is why Latin American states have a higher probability of facing trouble during transfer of power. This also gives enough reasons for states like North Korea as well as Russia to be concerned. North Korea was ruled and led by Kim Jong II since the 1980s. His authoritative and dictatorial command didn’t create many options as successors. Similarly, Russia has been run by Vladimir Putin since the 1990s. Even though Medvedev is virtually leading the state, actual power is still in the hands of Putin. In such a situation, if Putin were to vanish from the scene, it will invite political crisis.

These states can learn from China’s example as well. A communist state, China – rather than run on the whims of an individual – is being run by the Communist Party of China since 1949, which has a clearly defined planning process. This gives China stability as well as flexibility in leadership change and transfer of power within members of the ruling party and national leadership.


Thursday, July 26, 2012

Can India become a Telecom Manufacturing Hub?

Depite a Humongous Growth in The Telecom Sector, The Country has failed to build an Ecosystem that Promotes Telecom Manufacturing, Forcing Operators to Import most of The Equipment for their networks.

The latest joke doing the rounds in Electronic Niketan (IT and Telecom Minister’s Office) is that the import bill for telecom equipment will soon surpass petrol’s. It’s a telling comment on the Indian telecom industry, which has witnessed exponential growth in the last one decade but failed miserably on the manufacturing front.

Telecom industry in India has come a long way from having 5.07 million subscribers in 1991 to being the world’s second-largest market with a subscriber base 811.59 million by the end of March 2011. Ironically, in the year 2009-10, Indian products were able to meet just 3% of the telecom equipment demand in India. Equipment used for expansion of telecom networks was imported mostly from Europe and China. The figures highlight that the contribution of home-grown manufacturers to the great telecom success story has been negligible. Telecom manufacturing is one of the key areas for the government as well as telecom regulator to seriously look at, as the demand and supply chain will continue to widen. As per a TRAI report the subscriber base is expected to touch 1.5 billion by 2015, considering that India will continue to have 10% of the global market share.

Recently TRAI recommended to Department of Telecommunications (DoT) that manufacturing must be spurred to achieve the target of meeting 80% of the domestic demand. The recommendation was a little ambitious than the target for the XI Five Year Plan, which envisaged meeting 75% of the telecom equipment demand and handsets. If accepted in its present form, a cap on buying equipment manufactured outside the country cannot be ruled out. “The telecom ecosystem has so far failed to adequately spur the manufacturing segment. The demand and supply gap is widening. We need to have a proactive approach towards manufacturing of telecom equipment” says N.K. Goyal, Chairman, Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association (TEMA).

India’s information and communications technology equipment consumption is expected to touch 11.5% of the global market by 2015 from the current level of 5.5%, as per combined estimates of ISA-Forst & Sullivan, CII and others. A TRAI report says that requirement of equipment for 3G, LTE and WiMAX services alone would be around Rs 232.85 billion by 2015-16. The report predicts that by the year 2020, the combined demand would be worth Rs 264.56 billion. But the question is: Can India become the next telecom manufacturing hub and will it be able to meet 80% of the domestic demand for telecom equipment by 2020? People in the industry believe that if China can do it in a span of 10 years than India can do it as well. But the road ahead for telecom equipment manufacturing appears full of pitfalls.



 

Friday, July 20, 2012

India-Ranks on top in terms of Child Deaths due to Malnutrition

India, as a Unique case in The World, ranks 2nd in Farm output and also ranks on top in terms of Child Deaths due to Malnutrition. There are huge Flaws in The Delivery Mechanism. Who will solve them? 

Ironically, India is also home to over 230 malnourished people. It is a country where malnourishment is the primary cause for around 50% of child deaths. Given this, India can’t afford to waste any food products irresponsibly. And it’s not rocket science to find out the solution. All that the agriculture ministry should do, hand in hand with the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution is that investment into developing food stock capacity infrastructure should be increased massively. India, with only 60 million tonnes in food storage capacity, lacks far behind when compared with China’s 150 million tonnes. At the same time, godowns of Food Corporation of India (FCI) are 93% full.

Yes, the government is inviting private players to build new storage facilities and rent them to the government for seven years. But even if it materialises, that is never going to be sufficient, with growing farm output and productivity. The government has to make substantial investments to increase public storage capacity.

The food processing industry is still indigenous and unorganised. Only around 2% of perishable goods are processed every year – very low compared to Thailand’s 30%, Brazil’s 70% or 78% in the Philippines. Private players’ participation can play an important role, as the lack of an organised and integrated approach to a cold chain infrastructure leads to losses estimated at around Rs.1 trillion every year. As per various researches, allowing organised retail to directly buy food grains from farmers can increase efficiency in the supply chain. Farmers’ earnings can also go up by some 40-50%. But this needs strong political commitment from Pawar.